 
  

 , where p is any integer greater than 1.
Theoretically it possible to find an update to any order; ie. an equation
relating
, where p is any integer greater than 1.
Theoretically it possible to find an update to any order; ie. an equation
relating  with
 with  . We will find that
this relation is particularly nice when N=p. This will give rise to p-th
order iterations with a nice form. Our functions are constructed
from the Dedekind eta function instead of the theta functions.
. We will find that
this relation is particularly nice when N=p. This will give rise to p-th
order iterations with a nice form. Our functions are constructed
from the Dedekind eta function instead of the theta functions.
 
	Let  (with
 (with  ). As usual the Dedekind
eta function is defined as
). As usual the Dedekind
eta function is defined as

 Then
Then
 
 See [12, p. 121,] for a proof.
Now for p>1 (a positive integer) we define
See [12, p. 121,] for a proof.
Now for p>1 (a positive integer) we define
 
 where
where
 and
 and  .
It should be noted that the functions
.
It should be noted that the functions  and
 and  occured
naturally in the Borwein-Borwein cubic iteration [6], 
[7].
Define
 occured
naturally in the Borwein-Borwein cubic iteration [6], 
[7].
Define
 
 where
where
 
 Here
Here  .
From (3.2) we have
.
From (3.2) we have 
 
 and
and
 
 which follows from (3.3).
 The definition of
which follows from (3.3).
 The definition of  was chosen so that it had a form analogous to that of (2.4)
and that it satisfied a transformation like (3.9) below.
Using (3.3) and (3.8) it is not hard to show that
was chosen so that it had a form analogous to that of (2.4)
and that it satisfied a transformation like (3.9) below.
Using (3.3) and (3.8) it is not hard to show that
 
 Substituting r=1 gives
Substituting r=1 gives
 
 Since
Since  as
 as  we see that
 we see that
 
 
letbe fixed. We have
where
and
Further
where
 
When N=p, the function  has a nice form
 has a nice form

 so that
so that
 
 The proof of (3.17) follows easily from (3.2), (3.4)
and (3.15). From (3.8) and (3.14) we have
The proof of (3.17) follows easily from (3.2), (3.4)
and (3.15). From (3.8) and (3.14) we have
 
 By using (3.18) and (3.19) we find that (3.9)
and (3.18) give rise to two equations involving
By using (3.18) and (3.19) we find that (3.9)
and (3.18) give rise to two equations involving  and
and  . These equations may be solved easily to yield
. These equations may be solved easily to yield
 
 
 
 
  