, or
. Using the notation
introduced earlier we may assume that f is
If all coefficients are 0 except
, we are done. This
means one of the other terms is not 0 and we may assume
and by scaling assume
. Now set
to get an equivalent form with
. We now
divide into two cases depending on whether or not
.
Case 1:
.
Now set
.
Let
and
be a root of
. The
resulting form has
.
If
, the form is
. If
, this is
which is on the
list. Otherwise scale to get
. This is
which by interchanging variables is
which
is on the list.
If
, scale to get
. The resulting form is
. Transforming xyz by
gives this form.
Case 2:
.
Scale to get
. Now transform this by
. Set
and
a root
of
to get
. The form is now
. If
,
this is Case 1 with the variables permuted according to
. If not it can be scaled to give
. If
, this is
. Now
transform
by
and then by
to get it.
Assume then that
. The form is now
. Let a,b,c be the three distinct
roots of
where
.
Now transform the form xyz by
to get the form
. By choosing
appropriately these are then all equivalent.
This transformation is found as
in by finding a linear transformation which under
conjugation transforms the Lie algebras for the centralizers of the
forms. The coeffients for the transformed xyz are obtained using
the facts that abc=1, a+b+c=0,
and also that
. All but the last follow
immediately because a,b,c are the roots of the equation
. The last follows because
and
are the two roots of
. The sum of
these terms, 0, can be found
from computing the coefficient
of
in
. The product,
, can be evaluated
using the expressions above.