
Contents
Next: Conclusion.
Up: Generalizations of problem.
Previous: Existence of stopping
![[Annotate]](/organics/icons/sannotate.gif)
![[Shownotes]](../gif/annotate/sshow-141.gif)
Attempts to understand the distribution
of the sequence
have uncovered oblique
connections with ergodic-theoretic aspects of a generalization of the
3x+1 problem.
It is conjectured that the sequence
is uniformly distributed
.
(This conjecture seems intractable at present.)
One approach to this problem is to determine what kinds of
distributions can occur for sequences
,
where
is a fixed real number.
In this vein K. Mahler [49] considered the problem of whether or
not there exist real numbers
, which he called
Z-numbers,
having the property that

where
is the fractional part of x.
He showed that the set of Z-numbers is countable, by showing that there
is at most one Z-number in each interval
, for
.
He went on to show that a necessary condition for the existence of a Z-number
in the interval
is that the trajectory
of n produced by the
periodically linear function

satisfy

Mahler concluded from this that is unlikely that any Z-numbers exist.
This is supported by the following heuristic argument.
The function W may be interpreted as acting on the 2-adic
integers by (3.5), and it has properties
exactly analogous to the properties of T given by Theorem K.
In particular, for almost all 2-adic integers
the sequence of
iterates
has infinitely many values k with
.
Thus if a given
behaves like almost all 2-adic integers
, then (3.6) will not hold for n.
Note that it is possible that all the trajectories
for
are uniformly
distributed
for allk,
unlike the behavior of the function
.
In passing, I note that the possible distributions
of
;
for real
have an intricate structure
(see G. Choquet [16]--[22]
and A. D. Pollington [57], [58]).
In particular, Pollington [58] proves that there are
uncountably many real numbers
such that

in contrast to the at most countable number of solutions
of (3.4).

Contents
Next: Conclusion.
Up: Generalizations of problem.
Previous: Existence of stopping